^论文编号:GM574 ^论文字数:13689.页数:21 摘 要 “产品缺陷”是产品责任制度中的核心概念。就立法实践而言,我国由多部法律、法规构成的产品责任体系中的“产品缺陷”概念,判断标准不统一,从而导致法律适用困境。美国产品责任法起步较早,发展较快,在产品缺陷的立法方面为我国提供了许多经验和值得我国参考的地方。选择这样一个成熟问题中被忽略的细节为切入点,首先从国内外两方面的角度,对产品缺陷的定义、形式等相关概念进行了阐述,进行理论知识上的铺垫。随后对中美产品缺陷认定标准及其理论展开分析和比较。我国产品缺陷认定强制性标准优先于一般标准,而在实践中双重标准具有相当大的弊端。提出了一些改革建议和构想,建议形成一种混合型认定标准,该标准应以一般标准为主,强制标准为辅,同时根据实际情况的需要,借鉴和吸收国外其他判定标准,在实践中有针对性地进行灵活运用。 ABSTRACT The “defect” is the key concept in the product liability system. As far as law-making practice,the denotations of concepts of “defect” in many laws or rules about product liability system are inconsistent,which result in the dilemma of the law application. American products liability law starts early and has developed rather rap idly. We will reap much valuable experience through its law - making practice. With the neglected detail among the problem as the point of the penetration,this thesis studies some theories from home and abroad,makes a comparative study of the identifications of products liability defect and kinds of America and China,and analyses the implication of American products liability law on Chinese legislation. The status of Statutory Standards and Industry Standards are above Consumer Expectations Standards,and it’s is not conducive to the execution of law practice. This thesis advises some reform proposals .It is suggested that we should construct a hybrid standard like “Consumer Expectations Standards first,Statutory Standards and Industry Standards second,take different standards according to the actual situations as well.” KEYWORDS:Product Defect,Standards of Product Defect Identification,Comparative Study 正文目录 第一章 引言 1
|
| |
上一篇:中美专利制度差异与专利贸易摩擦.. | 下一篇:我国的税收政策对吸引国际直接投.. |
推荐论文 | 本专业最新论文 |
Tags:产品 缺陷 及其 认定 标准 比较 研究 | 2011-03-24 11:35:55【返回顶部】 |